Engineering capacity, on demand — for brokers and fintechs.

Both — the page is built around the two audiences you named. Brokers tend to need integrations (PSP, CRM, liquidity, reporting) and DevOps for their platform estate; fintechs tend to need a dedicated pod building product, plus the ledger/wallet/KYC integration layer. The same code standards, security gates and release discipline apply to either.

The pipeline board in the hero is ours to run: CI/CD with gated stages (lint → test → SAST/DAST → signed build → stage tick-test → canary prod), infrastructure-as-code (Terraform/Ansible), containerisation (Docker/Kubernetes with SBOMs), observability (metrics/logs/traces/alerting), secret management, on-call with runbooks, and blameless post-mortems. Environments are dev/stage/prod with ephemeral previews.

Yes — that’s Model 03 and a common starting point. The audit covers eight areas (security, data integrity, performance, reliability, test coverage, maintainability, DevOps, compliance) and outputs a severity-ranked remediation ledger with effort estimates, so you fix what matters first. Data-integrity and security findings are rated Critical because in money software they’re the ones that bite.

Six gates and immediate rollback. Nothing reaches prod without lint, tests, security scan, signed build, and a stage tick-test against live feed; prod deploys are canary, off-peak, with feature flags and hot rollback armed. It’s the same change discipline the dealing desk uses for swap/feature/routing changes — because a Friday deploy that breaks Monday is how brokers lose clients.

The fintech catalogue above: PSP/payment connectors (Adyen, Checkout.com, Nuvei, dLocal, Rapyd, Skrill, SticPay, MoonPay), banking/EMI payout+FX (Wise, Airwallex, Currenxie, FirstParty, Revolut, Fireblocks), ledger/wallet engines (Numary, Formance, custom event-sourced), KYC/screening (Sumsub, Onfido, Veriff, Chainalysis, Elliptic, TRM), liquidity/FIX (oneZero, PrimeXM, LMAX, Cboe FX, Binance, Coinbase), and data/reporting feeds.

Either. We work inside your existing stack (language, cloud, CI) or build into ours — and because we deploy MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, TradeLocker, MatchTrader and PriximTrader, our integrations fit the real systems rather than a theoretical API. Handover is documented and componentised so your team can maintain it.

Model 02: a cross-functional embedded team (developers + DevOps + QA) working your backlog at a steady velocity, with CI/CD and release management included, monthly and scalable in squad size. It’s engineering capacity without the hiring, churn and overhead of building a team — the model most fintechs pick when they’re shipping continuously.

Always, as a pipeline gate — SAST, DAST, dependency CVE scanning and secrets detection run on every build, and Critical/High findings block the merge. For inherited code, the audit’s security and data-integrity rows are rated Critical with exploit paths and fixes. Money software doesn’t get to ship insecure.

Yes — audit first (Model 03), then harden the pipeline and remediate the ledger, then move to a pod or fixed-bid work as needed. Takeover is staged so nothing breaks while you assess; the audit ledger is the shared plan.

Fixed-bid projects are scoped to a spec and quoted; dedicated pods are a monthly retainer scaled to squad size; advisory/audit is per engagement. All include the code audit and handover documentation appropriate to the model — you get a written proposal after discovery, no open-ended billing.